Stanford Medicine 2.0 Conference 2011 – The Report Card
Prajesh C., a member of the #hcsmanz community recently attended and presented at the 4th World Congress on Social Media, Mobile Apps and Internet/Web 2.0 in Medicine, Health and Biomedical Research (Medicine 2.0) in Standford University in September. He has kindly provided us with his evaluation of the event.
Medicine 2.0 (2011) has been touted as the number one conference to attend for those working in the field of health and social media technologies. We have all experienced conferences, shows, expos etc. that have been touted as the “one to be at”, in this guest post, I will give an honest account of my thoughts about Medicine 2.0 and the key take home points from my perspective.
Stanford University provided the ideal setting for this conference, where the age-old profession of Medicine collided with the new “kid” on the block Social Media. The historic buildings and perfectly manicured grounds provided the ideal back drop for the innovative, creative and large number of thought leaders attracted to this conference.
| Subject | Grade | Comments |
| Communication | A+ | Medicine 2.0 excelled in this area with Social Media providing an excellent medium of communication about the conference, this was through the #med2 tag which could be followed not only by conference attendees but also by a global audience. Communication from the organizing team was second to none. |
| Mathematics | A+ | Although there were more than 450 people at the conference, it felt like the number was not too big and not too small. The number of sessions available to attend was manageable and well spread out. |
| Social Studies | A+ | The setup of Medicine 2.0 allowed the interaction between thought leaders such as BJ Fogg, Susannah Fox, Jay Parkinson, Larry Chu, Jennifer Aaker etc. to happen in a seamless manner as each of them were very approachable and allowed for conversation to take place. |
| Music and effects | A+ | Each morning started with a lovely musical interlude with summit day almost feeling like a “rock concert” |
| Science | A+ | Any conference’s real merit is based on the scientific and academic rigor presented. Medicine 2.0 had a great global mix of strong scientific presentations, which perfectly complimented the practical applications that were presented at the summit. |
| Art | A+ | Visually the conference was very innovative with the use of QR Codes on name badges in order to link up people. |
General comments:Key take home messages from my view
|
||
| Final Assessment:This conference certainly lived up to its claim as “the one conference you must attend this year” | ||
Prajesh is a PhD candidate at the University of Otago. Having grown up in Zimbabwe, he completed his BSc in South Africa, and his MSc at the Univeristy of Otago. He is currently studying how mobile phones and Social Network Sites are being used by Gen Y to share health information. His other areas of interest include health disparity and health literacy especially in underserved population groups, the role of every person in taking ownership of their health within the healthcare system.He can be contacted at: pchhanabhai@infoscience.otago.ac.nz
His publications include:

Thanks Prajesh also nice to get some more background on you and your research after sharing so many tweets.
Thanks Malcolm
Intersting to learn your latest thoughts on HCSM after attending Medicine 2.0. I have never thought of the “us and them” aspect of the health care provider-consumer/patient relationship. The paternalistic model went out the window during the last 40 years, and I would like to think most health care providers practice a patient-centred approach, respecting patient autonomy, providing informed choice and embracing patient participation.
Thanks Dallas,
I too had the same thoughts as you, however after meeting with a few patients at the conference and hearing their stories I realize that this is not the case everywhere, there are still some paternalistic approaches to healthcare being practiced, sad but a reality in cases, which is why SM has provided a voice/means to limit that approach
Prajest your report card is spot-on.
Stanford Medicine 2.0 Conference 2011 was so remarkable for so many reasons. Your comprehensive feedback gives us a helpful overview. I especially appreciate your gift for design and how this made it easy to quickly grasps your data. To make a document or data simple and easy to understand is a unique gift and valuable skill.
One aspect of the conference that many were not aware was the degree of care and input Dr. Larry Chu gave to the ePatients and their perspective. He created a unique environment where ePatients actively engaged and shared their perspective. I believe this might have been the first time these subject matter experts were invited to actively participate in a medical conference.
There are a number of “behind the scenes stories” and documents that clearly demonstrate the care and detail Larry took to make sure the ePatients where seen as a critical piece to the success of the conference.
Mr. Nick Dawson and Mr. Hugo Campos also played an important role in The Stanford ePatient Forum.
This conference clearly demonstrated the value of inclusion, interdisciplinary collaboration and a global perspective.
@Lisa Medicine 2.0 always involved epatients (it may have been the first conference series where an epatient was the opening keynote speaker in 2009).
Here are some ideas on how we intend to engage epatients in the next 2012 Medicine 2.0 conference in Boston: http://medicine20congress.blogspot.com/2011/09/how-we-will-engage-epatients-at.html
Great points, Lisa.
Lisa,
Many thanks for your kind comments, its true there is a lot more that goes on behind the scenes that we are not aware off, and I and I think we all have our take home points that affect us as an individual.
Can’t argue with that – thanks for the kind evaluation. When Larry talked about the “one conference you must attend” he was actually referring to next years’ Medicine 2.0. The next Medicine 2.0 conference (aka 5th World Congress on Social Media, Mobile Apps, and Web 2.0 in Health, Medicine, and Biomedical Research) will be in Boston, Sept 15-16th, 2012 (Abstract Submission Deadline: March 7th, 2012), and we are already collecting the best ideas for speakers, panels, demos, sponsors.
Potential participants who are not already member of the Medicine 2.0 network (membership is free) can sign up at http://www.medicine20congress.com/ocs/index.php/med/med2012/user/account to receive notifications about the next congress and suggest speakers/panels/sponsors. Hope to see you all at the next Medicine 2.0 event at Harvard Medical School!
I can’t yet imagine a trip to Boston from Darwin but I know Gunther is right. I hope all my Aussie colleagues can plan ahead today and submit their abstracts and represent the country and exchange innovative ideas.
Hi Gunther,
Many thanks for your comment, I agree that Larry did say Med 2.0 2012 was the conference to attend, however before that was mentioned, within the community down here in Nz and Aus Med2.0 2011 was highlight recommended to be the one conference we attend this year, this was echoed by Kishan who had attended Med 2.0 2010. His feedback from that event further highlighted the impact of this conference.
Look forward to hopefully making it to Boston
Prajesh! Excellent and fun way to present your findings.
I like that you went beyond the basics to review the music, effects, and art — three additional aspects that made the conference so remarkable by heightening the excitement and passion all of us share.
Beyond that, I don’t know if the teens you work with study what we call “Home Ec” in the US…. but if that category were added to your report card, I imagine it would also get an A+! The food and catering service were top notch!
Seriously, though, great remarks, and in particular this deceptively simple one you made is crucial: “Sometimes it boils down to cost, but it doesn’t cost anything to show empathy.”
Thanks!
PS: What about a mention of your presentation and poster session?!
Hi Lisa,
Thank you for the great idea to hear from Prajesh about his presentation and poster session. I’ll get in touch with him regarding this.
Kishan
Thanks Liza,
Haha just thought I would try something different, and thanks have to go to Kishan for allowing me to post it in this manner.
As for my work hmmm ill have to think about the way to set that up
Pingback: The Politics of Adulthood « Pretzels and Karma
Thanks Prajesh for this recap. It has taken me a while to respond, but I think your key takeaways attest to the fact that even a month out, they resonate true. While none of the key take-aways are new, I feel that the tipping point is closer and that increasingly positive action is coming out of the talking. We are no longer just preaching to the converted.
As a part 2, I would like to hear your thoughts on what could be done better or added to med2 for 2012. Let’s make Boston med2 even better.
Pingback: Top 10 Youth Health 2.0 articles of 2011 « Youth Health 2.0
Pingback: Top 10 Youth Health 2.0 articles of 2011 « Health and Medical News and Resources